Saw this article, "Group of Venezuelans sue Trump admin for temporary immigration protections", https://www.foxnews.com/person/d/michael-dorgan, and while not pretending to be an immigration expert think this is more a call of "fire" in a crowded theater when none exists. The Trump immigration deportation program is designed first against criminal elements in the country illegally and secondly those who entered during the period of "no border" under the Biden administration. This suit on behalf of 600,000 illegals from a specific country may include some in these categories but by some examples given in the article includes many that don't belong. Trump's team is not rounding up people at random as the media and liberals would like to represent. This over reaction is a liberal strategy to "muddy the water" about what the administration is doing. Further, the "protected status" appears to have been based on Venezuela's poor economic condition which is not in itself a reason to receive "refugees" above policy guidelines. If that were the case there are poorer countries who would qualify ahead of Venezuela.
Pam Bondi needs to bring this grift forward pursue those funds and prosecute Abrams and others. It's time for these criminals to go to jail.
Saw this article, "Group of Venezuelans sue Trump admin for temporary immigration protections", https://www.foxnews.com/person/d/michael-dorgan, and while not pretending to be an immigration expert think this is more a call of "fire" in a crowded theater when none exists. The Trump immigration deportation program is designed first against criminal elements in the country illegally and secondly those who entered during the period of "no border" under the Biden administration. This suit on behalf of 600,000 illegals from a specific country may include some in these categories but by some examples given in the article includes many that don't belong. Trump's team is not rounding up people at random as the media and liberals would like to represent. This over reaction is a liberal strategy to "muddy the water" about what the administration is doing. Further, the "protected status" appears to have been based on Venezuela's poor economic condition which is not in itself a reason to receive "refugees" above policy guidelines. If that were the case there are poorer countries who would qualify ahead of Venezuela.